What the Ban on Campaign Finance Is about
It is imperative to mention that the courts have chosen to stick to the ban imposed on contribution of unlimited funds to political campaigns. There is a good number of Americans whose interest is to see the part played by money in politics being put under control. This is why so many people have been eagerly waiting for this ruling on whether corporates will be allowed to contribute in future. The decision taken up by the Supreme Court will without a doubt bot go well with so many people. They refused to lift the ban on this political campaign finance law. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to understand that nothing really happened in court. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. Such would time and again come about if the money is not directly linked to a given individual. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. It is imperative to mention that these companies indicated that the first amendment rights of companies was not being considered. The argument was based on the fact that political donations were components of freedom of speech. They also appealed to the constitution which indicates the need to equally protect each individual. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is due to the fact that they can spiral to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.